Electronic Supplement to
Poroelastic Properties of the Arbuckle Group in Oklahoma Derived from Well Fluid Level Response to the 3 September 2016 Mw 5.8 Pawnee and 7 November 2016 Mw 5.0 Cushing Earthquakes
by Kayla A. Kroll, Elizabeth S. Cochran, and Kyle E. Murray
Table S2. Best-Fitting Set of Poroelastic Parameters Determined for Hypotheses 1 and 2 in the Main Article (H1 and H2, Respectively) B is derived from Ku, Kfl, and ϕ
| Event |
Ku (GPa) |
Kfl (GPa) |
ϕ (%) |
B |
| H1 |
28.79 |
3 |
7.4 |
0.42 |
| H2P 7 |
23.28 |
2.6 |
12.3 |
0.52 |
| H2P 8 |
37.07 |
3 |
6.2 |
0.43 |
There are two sets of poroelastic parameters, because this hypothesis assumes the poroelastic parameters are spatially variable and are different between each well.
[ Back ]